Source & Media Scanner
Find permitted posts and videos; read transcripts and image text with OCR.
POLLABPolitical Laboratory
POLLAB PRESENTSPolitical Laboratory · Private presentationIntelligence for
the strategy room.
A dedicated research environment for teams reading the public conversation.
Scroll to explore ↓
The intelligence mandate
An intelligence practice designed for the strategist team, with a consistent view across leaders, issues and sources.
What is gathering attention?
Trace emerging issues and changes in public discussion.What do people actually mean?
Read language, sentiment, irony and the surrounding conversation.What can we substantiate?
Keep the source, original wording and analyst judgment together.The flagship intelligence layer
A proposed flow of information: public conversations enter, specialized analyzers interpret, evidence stays attached.
Illustrative motion · Proposed connected experience · Collection requires approved access
Connected conversation research
Proposed source coverage preserves the conversation around an item, not just its headline or engagement count.
Permitted public posts, captions, comments and available reply threads.
Public posts, replies, quoted posts and the surrounding conversation.
Video metadata, available transcripts, comments and available replies.
Approved news, websites, official documents and consented field reports.
APIs, authorized exports and permitted web scraping. Coverage depends on source permissions, platform rules, availability and retention settings; this presentation does not connect to live sources.
A research instrument for every layer
A proposed set of focused tools, organized around the questions an analyst needs to answer.
Find permitted posts and videos; read transcripts and image text with OCR.
Read captions, comments, replies and quoted context.
Track issue growth, repeat mentions and unusual bursts.
Separate tone from the position taken toward an issue.
Interpret Telugu script, Romanized Telugu and mixed language.
Review profanity, harassment and potentially threatening language.
Organize public mentions of individual politicians by issue.
Detect duplicates, missing replies, unavailable content and claims needing review.
Watchlist Scanner / Proposed module
Scan selected public politicians, issues, keywords and public source accounts for new mentions, comments, replies and changes worth reviewing.
Named public politicians and verified aliases, with ambiguous mentions held for review.
Local demo · Saved only in this browser
Illustrative review queue · Select a watchlist
| Watching | New signal | Source context |
|---|---|---|
| Public Figure A | New issue mention | Public X thread |
| Public Figure B | Comment discussion | Instagram post + replies |
| Public Figure C | Statement reference | YouTube transcript |
Proposed output: a source-linked review queue and scheduled digest, with trend spikes and coverage gaps. Examples are synthetic; this presentation performs no live scanning.
Trend intelligence
Notice when an issue grows, where it begins and whether the replies tell a different story.
Inspect the source and reply context before drawing a conclusion.
Where the issue first appears in the collected material.
How attention changes against the selected baseline.
Whether themes return across sources and time windows.
Sentiment & stance intelligence
A supportive tone toward one action can sit beside frustration about another. Preserve that distinction.
Proposed analysis separates sentiment, target, issue, stance and confidence. Uncertain language goes to analyst review.
Synthetic comment / analysis example
“Good that the road work started. But why has the drainage issue been ignored?”
Independent Telugu analyzer
భాషకు సందర్భం ముఖ్యం
Telugu script, Romanized Telugu, English mixing, local expressions and sarcasm need more than a literal translation.
Synthetic language example
“రోడ్డు బాగుంది… వర్షం పడితేనే అసలు సంగతి!”“The road looks good… the real story comes out when it rains!”
An apparently positive statement about the road.
Possible irony about performance during rain.
Script normalization, transliteration and mixed language.
Native language review of dialect, ambiguity and labels.
Separate language risk analyzer
A dedicated foul language analysis workflow with the speaker, target, context and severity kept visible.
Disagreement, anger and criticism of a public action.
Offensive wording; context determines its target and use.
Language directed at an individual or a group.
Language requiring urgent human assessment.
Quoted speech, satire and counterspeech can be misread. Labels assist human judgment; they do not establish intent, illegality or platform violations.
Public Figure Lens
Illustrative dossier
Public
Figure A
Public statements and collected public mentions, organized for source-based research.
| Identity | Public name, role and verified aliases; ambiguous mentions flagged. |
|---|---|
| Issues | Topics linked to public statements, posts and mentions. |
| Reaction | Issue-specific sentiment and stance, with source limitations. |
| Timeline | Statements, events and changes in collected discussion. |
| Evidence | Source links, dates, original wording and review status. |
Compare equivalent sources and time windows. Research public conduct; avoid private-life speculation and sensitive personal profiling.
EvidenceDesk
Keep the original item, reply context, source reference and analyst note attached to the interpretation.
The proposed workflow separates observed material, machine labels and analyst conclusions. A prototype exists; the integrated evidence workflow remains proposed.
“Has anyone seen an update on the drainage work?”
A connected research workflow
A proposed team rhythm that turns permitted public material into a concise, reviewable account of what changed.
Select public sources, people, issues and the observation window.
Run trend, sentiment, Telugu and language risk analysis.
Inspect source items, uncertain labels and competing interpretations.
Summarize the changes with evidence, limits and open questions.
An issue brief · Public figure dossier · Language risk review · Evidence register · Questions for further research
A clear view of readiness
| Component | Current basis | Proposed next step |
|---|---|---|
| Collection & research | Historically demonstrated | Confirm current source access and repeatable collection scope. |
| Cortex Signal / Meta | Partial integration | Validate access, thread coverage and analysis handoffs. |
| EvidenceDesk | Prototype | Connect source capture, review and evidence export. |
| Connected intelligence suite | Proposed | Build and evaluate the specialized analyzers and team workflow. |
Agree the source scope. Assemble a reviewed Telugu benchmark. Evaluate retrieval coverage, language labels, source traceability and analyst effort before defining wider deployment.
AZIMUTH / The strategist edition
A dedicated intelligence workspace for the people doing the research, asking the questions and reviewing the evidence.
Cortex Signal AI · An Azimuth proposition

Presented byPOLLABPolitical Laboratory
This is a separate strategist-team presentation. Product capabilities beyond the stated foundation are proposed; all examples and visual data are illustrative.
Presenter: Political Laboratory ↗ · Foundation: Azimuth reference presentation ↗